logo logo

The giant blackhole that will eat us all

Resize text - +

There’s been quite a lot of talk recently about the “Large Hedron Collider“, or LHC, by far the largest particle accelerator in existence, which was inaugurated just a few weeks ago. I know next to nothing about quantum mechanics, but the entire scientific world seems to agree that the LHC will greatly help us answer long-dated questions that go back to the very fabric of matter and the Universe itself.

The structure is a total 27 km in diameter and will enable us to accelerate two fluxes ions and other particles up to 99.99% of the speed of light in the opposite direction and make them collide, then studying the particles that are being created in the process.

Welding the LHC

Welding the LHC

Through this mechanism, scientists and engineers are able to recreate in a strictly controlled environment the particles and overall conditions that, as far as we know, only existed for a tiny fraction of a second after the Big Bang and then disappeared forever.

In particular, what physicists hope to unveil is whether the Higgs bosons theorized by the Standard Model — the particle physics theory describing three of the four fundamental forces along with the particle that take part in their interaction — actually exist, or if the entire model has to be adapted to better describe our Universe.

The Higgs bosons, nicknamed the “God particles”, are the only particles theorized in the standard model which haven’t been observed yet: should we succeed in finding them, we would be able to explain how otherwise massless particles can cause matter to have mass by explaining the difference between photons (which are massless) and W/Z bosons (which do have mass).

An answer to this question would, in turn, help us answer other fundamental points with regard to the birth of the Universe itself, including what is the nature of dark matter and dark energy and whether the extra dimensions theorized by the string theory actually exist. As science-fictiony as this sounds, that is nothing but what CERN scientists are going to investigate in the next decades.

There is a very small possibility that high-speed collisions taking place at the LHC could bring to the formation of unstable micro black-holes. While Hawking himself hopes that this will help verify his theories on what has been dubbed the “Hawking radiation”, some have advanced the hypothesis that such black holes could actually be stable and therefore grow in time, eventually leading to the destruction of the Earth as we know it.

The LHC seen from above

The LHC seen from above

Such doomsday scenarios have been scrutinized by a third-party scientist commission in many occasions, eventually leading them to the conclusion that there is no danger in LHC’s experiments, since high-speed reactions like those that are subject to experiment are happening all the time in our Universe without any sort of catastrophic consequences. In particular, there is no scientific reason whatsoever to believe that the micro black holes would become stable and keep growing in time.

Still, the reports weren’t enough to keep crowds of angry and misinformed protesters from asking to stop the experiments at LHC, believing the Earth-devouring black hole theory to be true and emphasizing that we don’t know enough about these reactions in the first place to say with certainty that these experiments are completely safe.

Again, I don’t know much at all about quantum mechanics: all I want to say here is that, once again, the media emphasized the part of the story that sold the most… and when you do this kind of misinformation, not telling the whole story to the public, are you really surprised to see protesters asking top scientists to halt a multi-billion dollar experiments to “prevent the end of the world?”


Did you like this post? Make sure you check out my other articles at Gizmag and add me on Twitter or Google+ to get notified when my next article comes out!

bottom
Related posts
Wolfram|Alpha vs. True Knowledge
Wolfram|Alpha vs. True Knowledge
Lately, the media has directed a whole lot of attention to the upcoming Wolfram|Alpha,... 
What’s going to happen in 2012?
What’s going to happen in 2012?
Folklore has it that a big, most likely catastrophic event (i.e., the ‘doomsday’)... 
Loebner prize and the state-of-the-art chatbots
Loebner prize and the state-of-the-art chatbots
Loebner Prize gold medal The Loebner prize is an annual competition for “chat... 
Solar-powered AI to land on Mars?
Solar-powered AI to land on Mars?
Artificial intelligence is one of my strongest interests: the ongoing research in the... 
12 Comments | leave your comment »
  1. avatar Lance@Jesus Devotion Says:

    Do you think the sun could collapse and turn into a black hole? Just wondering.

  2. avatar olly@Automatic Garag Says:

    I did find this subject fascinating.

    It is interesting to know that Stephen hawking gave it less than one percent chance of happening. That it still a pretty risky probability at say 1/2 a percent to risk!

    I wonder if there is any chance at all then, if this happens naturally every day, that there is less than a 1% chance of a naturally created black hole appearing and consuming the earth?

    Interesting stuff!

  3. avatar Ste@free ps3 Says:

    I got swept into this myself when it first came about. It's amazing how the media can get you worked up, and sometimes you end up believing something that's simply ridiculous. I was soon put right my a friend who was studying towards a physics degree at the time.

  4. avatar Ulrika@Leadership Says:

    @Lance, I don't believe that the sun is actually big enough to become a black hole eventually – the mass of the star needs to be many times greater. We have such a medium Sun.

  5. avatar jon-jon@songs Says:

    I dont think sun will completely turn into black hole.

    as said.. stephen hawking said..there is 1 % chance of happening so.

    still, we can not completely rule it out.

  6. avatar Rory@Miracles, Signs Says:

    1 percent is a significant risk, but even more interesting, it would seem the margin of error for predictions of risk are highly speculative, and could be huge.

    Whenever one is experimenting with such vast power for the first time, no one can really predict what will happen, and what the probability or extent of destruction could be.

  7. avatar ava@check this out Says:

    This is one of those instances where you can't tell those scientist you told them so, when we all get sucked into one.

  8. avatar sarah@diy solar pane Says:

    I think that there is no way we are smart enough to make a blackhole that will produce enough energy and gravity that it will suck up the earth – impossible – for at least our modern technology.

  9. avatar Neil@Free Nintendo D Says:

    Hi – really good site you have made. I enjoyed reading this posting. I did want to issue a comment to tell you that the design of this site is very aesthetically pleasing. I used to be a graphic designer, now I am a copy editor for a marketing firm. I have always enjoyed playing with computing machines and am attempting to learn code in my spare time (which there is never enough of lol).

  10. avatar Martin@Garage Door R Says:

    @jon-jon 1% in the bigger picture is a huge chance. But like many have said, there is a margin of error to account for.

  11. avatar outspan Says:

    Thank you! The theme is TidalForce from elegantthemes, but I've been heavily modifying it over the months. I'm quite pleased with the result, even though some people say the blue is too hard on the eyes… not me though, I love it :)

  12. avatar outspan Says:

    Eventually it will, but that wasn't really the point of my post :)

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

What's on your mind?

bottom